<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">

	<channel>
		<title>OneSangha &#124; Buddhist Bloggers &#124; So how does that blogging work for you, anyway?</title>
		<atom:link href="http://www.onesangha.org/groups/buddhist-bloggers/forum/topic/so-how-does-that-blogging-work-for-you-anyway/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
		<link>http://www.onesangha.org/groups/buddhist-bloggers/forum/topic/so-how-does-that-blogging-work-for-you-anyway/</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 17:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://buddypress.org/?v=1.2.9</generator>
		<language>en</language>
		<description></description>
		<item>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">15@http://www.onesangha.org/groups/buddhist-bloggers/forum/topic/so-how-does-that-blogging-work-for-you-anyway/#post-15</guid>
			<title>Tylik on So how does that blogging work for you, anyway?</title>
			<link>http://www.onesangha.org/groups/buddhist-bloggers/forum/topic/so-how-does-that-blogging-work-for-you-anyway/#post-15</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 17:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Tylik</dc:creator>
			<description>I read it a lot more reliably when I&#039;m home sick, I&#039;m afraid. But yes, it&#039;s one of the ones I try to follow.

I&#039;ve found a balance - maybe not a good one - between writing with some degree of immediacy and being adequately opaque about things that did not seem appropriate in the past, but those boundaries seem to be doing a lot of moving at the moment. It must be good for me, I&#039;m feeling thrown for a loop. But while I have a surprisingly good community out here, sometimes, well, really, I feel the lack of people to whine to! (Though I&#039;m pretty sure you&#039;re on the filter for what whining I do do. Perhaps I&#039;ll start sending Chen Laoshi whiny letters in Chinese. He might think that was funny.) 

Separately, I&#039;m suspecting that I&#039;m going to start doing more writing, though the academic work will probably keep that to at best a dribble. Some of it I&#039;m pretty likely to post - the Zhuangzi stuff is pretty straightforward, for instance (well, except for being Zhuangzi. But my notes are straightforward).</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">14@http://www.onesangha.org/groups/buddhist-bloggers/forum/topic/so-how-does-that-blogging-work-for-you-anyway/#post-14</guid>
			<title>Al Jigen Billings on So how does that blogging work for you, anyway?</title>
			<link>http://www.onesangha.org/groups/buddhist-bloggers/forum/topic/so-how-does-that-blogging-work-for-you-anyway/#post-14</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 01:49:32 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Al Jigen Billings</dc:creator>
			<description>Well, I don&#039;t blog a lot about my practice, per se. If you read my blog (and I know that you do, Catherine), you&#039;ll see that I blog a lot about stuff going on in general, things I&#039;m reading, or occasionally about Buddhist (or other ideas). I don&#039;t actually talk about practice though because I think it is easy to get one&#039;s ego wrapped up in practice the more that one talks about it. At least for me, the less attention that I draw to it, the less I feel like I&#039;m doing it as an act of display towards others.</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">13@http://www.onesangha.org/groups/buddhist-bloggers/forum/topic/so-how-does-that-blogging-work-for-you-anyway/#post-13</guid>
			<title>Tylik on So how does that blogging work for you, anyway?</title>
			<link>http://www.onesangha.org/groups/buddhist-bloggers/forum/topic/so-how-does-that-blogging-work-for-you-anyway/#post-13</link>
			<pubDate>Sat, 24 Jul 2010 20:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Tylik</dc:creator>
			<description>I&#039;m curious about how blogging fits into people&#039;s lives. Having done a fair bit of writing at other points of my life, I&#039;ve been somewhat hesitant to write much about many parts of my practice because I&#039;ve wanted to keep the focus on what I&#039;m doing as I&#039;m doing it, and I&#039;m over apt to love my own words as it is. But I find that my teaching Chen* is changing a lot, and I&#039;m becoming more willing to talk about whatever I happen to be working on in that context. Which has me at least considering (further) that perhaps it&#039;s time for me to grow up and get over myself.

* Chen Taijiquan. Which should be distinct from Chan, but such discretion is not a major feature of my life.</description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>
